For the
last two years, a Coastal and Marine Mercury Ecosystem Research Collaborative
(C-MERC) team of scientists has examined the mercury sources and levels in
Hudson River Estuary, San Francisco Bay, Gulf of Mexico, Long Island Sound, Chesapeake
Bay, Gulf of Maine,
Arctic Ocean, and the open ocean. In their
latest report they said that mercury released into the air and then deposited
into oceans contaminates fish and other seafood commonly eaten by people in the
U.S.
and rest of the world.
They also
said that „mercury deposited from the atmosphere ranges from 56% of the mercury
loading to several large gulfs to approximately 90% in the open ocean“.
The consumption of ocean fish such as tuna can lead to high mercury exposure. |
Mercury is
very harmful neurotoxin that can lead to many adverse health effects and exposure
to higher concentrations of mercury can even cause permanent neurological and
brain damage.
For most of
people in the world the main source of mercury exposure is through the
consumption of ocean fish such as tuna. What this means is that decreasing the
levels of mercury pollution in our oceans would lead to healthier diet because
we would be eating fish without having to worry whether we are exposed to increased
levels of mercury pollution when doing so.
The
scientists also report than mercury concentrations in fish population would
decline roughly in proportion to decreases in mercury inputs. The problem here
is that achieving any significant decrease in mercury pollution requires
substantial cuts in emissions from industrial sources such as coal power plants
because there is already a large quantity of mercury in terrestrial
environments and ocean waters.
If we want
to have healthy fish on our dinner tables we will have to find the way to
reduce mercury pollution from our industry. The good staring point would be to impose
much stricter mercury pollution standards for fossil fuels fired power plants.
No comments:
Post a Comment